Self Referential Issue AI checking AI itself

Will AI be able to check the difference between AI(self) and Real images ? Is it not Self-Referential issue Fundamentally in Godel context ? 

I think so as of now that this might not be consistently possible ! That may change later as we go ahead...

Speed Light Changes over time

Yes Speed of Light Changes over time and even Time has Space . Some mathematical issues with Special Relativity Theory by Einstein. 

I wrote this in 2005 to Prof. Deepak Dhar(Padma Bhushan awardee and Boltzman Medalist) at TIFR way back then now at IISER Pune. 

Circular Problem and Self-Referential issues in a Democratic Set up

Self -Referential Paradox .

This has seemingly serious practical implications for laws, constitution and democracy as well.

Some Questions : 

Paradox of Self Amendment: Who will amend the amendment clause itself ? 

Practically speaking :

Will Elected Representatives pass laws by against themselves in the interest of nation if required ?

Will Bureaucrats act against themselves if required ?

Will Judges pass judgement against themselves if required ?

Or even People support something against themselevs in the interest of nation 

Or anyone for that matter.

This is related to very important foundational Paradoxical issues in logic for centuries. 

To resolve these fundamental issues, there should be the appropriate provisions.

Stress Adjusted Risk-Return : Quantum Human Behavioral Metrics

Stress Adjusted Rate of Return

Pankaj Mani

Looking into account the Quantum Human Behavioral Psychological aspects into the Classical Metrics of Risk, there is need for a New Metric that truly measures the Risk-Return Figure of Investment.

Human Behavior and Psychology are extremely important aspects how an investor feels happiness out of his investment and must incorporate the stress level involved in the current age. Unfortuantely, those are not taken into account in the conventional system of investment world. Human well being is often ignored while trying to maximize the highest risk-adjusted return.We can see why this is important from Nobel Laureates e.g. Daniel Kahneman, Angus Deaton and my own research works on Psychology in Real Human Behavior.

Conventional metrics of simply calculating Risk-Return in the absolute classical way for all, needs to be modified as the Perspective of Risk-Return is a Quantum Phenomenon for different Investors Relatively. In the classical definitions of Risk-Return, the hidden Quantum Human Behavioral Stress Level is often ignored but that’s extremely important for happiness level of an investor at biological mind level.

Keeping into view these different aspects of investment, which are practically very significant, we propose new Quantum Behavioral Metrics of Risk that maximizes the happiness level of an investor by achieving risk-return while managing the hidden stress level to achieve that..

We believe that in order to maintain a healthy balance between risk-return and the mindfulness happiness of an investor, stress factor is extremely important that must be taken into account. This has scientific reason because just having more and more risk-adjusted return may not bring overall maximization of happiness and mindfulness to an investor’s quantum mind because of the hidden aspects like stress, feeling of pain, anxiety..

Hence, based on the above practical points, we propose a new simple Metric that should be maximized while making investments whether in financial markets or otherwise in life rather than just the Numerator part as often conventionally done..

SARR : Stress Adjusted Risk-Return =

Risk-Return Achieved / Stress Level to achieve that Risk-Return.

SARR should be calculated for different choices Relatively not Absolutely as done in Relative Valuation Approach to make better decision making.Stress Level Numbers can be assigned relatively to different choices for quantitative analysis.

Nature of Risk , Quantum Vs Classical

What is Risk ? Risk is Uncertainty...which is the fundamental characteristics of Nature hence market..So, it would always remain in some forms..one or the other...can't be completely removed....! Also, it's quantum depending on individual observer rather absolute for all classically as usually done...

The Sense of "We" vs "I" !

The Plural Conscious Sense of "We" as simultaneously existing is itself delusional...

"I" and "You" are not absolutely both possibly. existing ! "Others" exist in my world realtively..rather than all exist in one absolute world

Hence to use "I" rather than "We" technically. The use of "We" inherently assumes the absolute world for all !!

Prove first that Proof Exist !

In Mathematics, at deeper level, what is also quite important before proving something is to first check the inherent assumption that everything is provable--

Hence try to prove first why a certain problem is provable in the system rather than just starting to prove the problem...

Godel had shattered the the utopian dream of proving everything in mathematics.... !